Author Archives: Keith Greenwood

Member News Roundup

 

Stephen Bates (University of Nevada, Las Vegas) is one of the three petitioners who are trying to dislodge what may be Watergate’s last secret: the special prosecutor’s report to the House as it considered impeachment of President Nixon. The judge put the report under seal in 1974, and it has stayed that way ever since. Bates filed the petition on Sept. 14 in collaboration with Benjamin Wittes, a Brookings Institution senior fellow and the editor in chief of Lawfare, an online publication that specializes in national security legal policy issues, and Jack Goldsmith, a Harvard Law School professor and senior Justice Department official in the George W. Bush Administration. Bates is a law professor who, as a federal prosecutor working for Ken Starr, the independent counsel who investigated President Bill Clinton, co-wrote the report to Congress recommending that Mr. Clinton be impeached. The three are represented by Protect Democracy, a government watchdog group.

Nicholas Hirshon (William Paterson University) will celebrate the publication of his book, We Want Fish Sticks: The Bizarre and Infamous Rebranding of the New York Islanders, by the University of Nebraska Press on December 1. The book, which is based on his doctoral dissertation at Ohio University, chronicles the wacky story of the National Hockey League team in the mid-1990s, when the franchise abandoned its original logo—a map of Long Island with the bold letters “NY”—in favor of a cartoon fisherman similar to the mascot for Gorton’s frozen seafood. The book’s title alludes to a chant that fans of opposing teams used to taunt the Islanders.

Berkley Hudson (University of Missouri-Columbia) has published a book chapter with two recent Mizzou doctoral graduates in journalism — Carlos A. Cortés-Martínez of the Universidad de La Sabana in Colombia, and Joy Jenkins of the Reuters Institute for Journalism Studies at the University of Oxford in England. They analyzed stories in SoHo, a Colombian men’s publication that’s been compared to Esquire, GQ and Playboy. The authors investigated the place of female reporters in South America in the sphere of Gonzo — a field traditionally studied through the works of Western, male journalists. The chapter, titled “La Revista Prohibida Para las Mujeres: Gonzo By Women in SoHo Magazine of Colombia, South America,” appears in Fear and Loathing Worldwide: Gonzo Journalism Beyond Hunter S. Thompson, edited by Robert Alexander and Christine Isager and published by Bloomsbury.

Tom Mascaro (Bowling Green State University) has been awarded American Journalism’s “Article of the Year” for his study that appeared in the spring issue of the journal. “The Blood of Others: Television Documentary Journalism as Literary Engagement” argues documentary journalists have been too narrowly defined as strictly journalists. Mascaro posits documentarians, like their counterparts in literature, intimately engage with and immerse themselves in the topics they research, which warrants examining documentaries as both acts of journalism and engaged literature. Mascaro was recognized for his work at the American Journalism Historians Association’s National Convention in Salt Lake City.

Victor Pickard (University of Pennsylvania) has a new article in the International Journal of Communication titled “The Strange Life and Death of the Fairness Doctrine: Tracing the Decline of Positive Freedoms in American Policy Discourse.” One of the most famous and controversial media policies ever enacted, the Fairness Doctrine suffered a final deathblow in August 2011 when the Federal Communications Commission permanently struck it from the books. However, the Doctrine continues to be invoked by proponents and detractors alike. Using mixed methods, Pickard’s study historically contextualizes the Fairness Doctrine while drawing attention to how it figures within contemporary regulatory debates.

 

 

Book Excerpt: Kimberly Wilmot Voss, Re-Evaluating Women’s Page Journalism in the Post-World War II Era

Kimberly Wilmot Voss, Re-Evaluating Women’s Page Journalism in the Post-World War II Era: Celebrating Soft News (Palgrave Macmillan, 2018)

Women are most likely to be included in journalism history if they make it to the front pages of newspapers, cover sports or become wartime correspondents – when they dared to take on men’s turf.[i] Only during wartime did women leave the women’s section, other than a token few. They were rarely part of newsrooms at most metropolitan newspapers. Yet, in the years between World War II and the beginnings of the women’s liberation movement in the late 1960s, many women’s page journalists were also redefining women’s roles.

For much of the scholarship on journalism history, the story of women’s pages has been consistently defined with a broad stroke, described as the four Fs of family, fashion, food and furnishings. The women’s pages were also the place to find high society news, advice columns, and wedding information. More often, the term fluff was applied to women’s page material. Yet, the sections were rarely examined to see if there was more to it. Recent scholarship has begun to shine a light on the women who covered soft news.[ii] The truth is more complicated as many women’s pages had long been refining roles for women as recent scholarship has shown.[iii]

Continue reading

Remembering Wally Eberhard–the gifted scholar, inspiring teacher, treasured mentor, dear friend and kind soul

AEJMC history division member Wally Eberhard passed away on October 7, 2018, his 87th birthday, after a short battle with pneumonia. This celebration of his life, a tribute offered by the University of Georgia’s Grady College of Journalism & Mass Communication, explores his lasting legacy as a gifted scholar, inspiring teacher, treasured mentor, dear friend and kind soul. Eberhard will be missed by all those who crossed paths with him, especially his friends in AEJMC’s history division.

One AEJMC history division member, Michael D. Murray, a University of Missouri Board of Curators’ Distinguished Professor Emeritus, recently shared a reflection and some reminiscences about the life of Eberhard:

Continue reading

Award Call: Hazel Dicken-Garcia Award for Outstanding Master’s Thesis

AWARD CALL
Hazel Dicken-Garcia Award for Outstanding Master’s Thesis in
Journalism and Mass Communication History

Deadline: February 1, 2019 (11:59 p.m. Pacific)

The History Division of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication will present its first award for Outstanding Master’s Thesis in Journalism and Mass Communication History in 2019, recognizing the outstanding journalism and/or mass communication history thesis completed during the 2018 calendar year. This award is named for the late Hazel Dicken-Garcia, a long-time division member whose estate funds the prize.

The award will be presented during the member business meeting at the 2019 AEJMC Conference, scheduled for Aug. 7-9 in Toronto, Ontario. In addition to receiving plaques honoring the outstanding thesis, the student author and his/her thesis advisor each will receive $100.

Any master’s thesis addressing journalism and/or mass communication history will be considered, regardless of research method or theoretical perspective. Submissions must be in English.

The thesis must have been submitted, defended, and filed in final form to the author’s degree-granting university between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2018.

Continue reading

Journalism History Launches Podcast On iTunes

The AEJMC History Division and Journalism History are excited to announce our new podcast is now live on iTunes. You can find it by searching Journalism History in the purple “Podcasts” app on your iPhone or find it on this website: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/journalism-history/id1437309234

Here are some answers to questions you may have about this new project.

First, what is a podcast?

A podcast is like a radio show that you can tune into at any time and listen to individual episodes that are all related to a general theme (in our case, journalism history). There are different ways to format a podcast, but many focus on evergreen content. Therefore, if someone finds your podcast six months or a year later, the content of the show is still relevant. This is our goal.

Why do we want a podcast?

“The new podcast is part of the leadership team’s goals to bring more multimedia into our field to reach a wider audience of academics, students, journalists and the general public with our research and knowledge,” said Teri Finneman, vice chair of the History Division. “Plus, it’s simply fun and interesting to hear about others’ journalism history work outside of conference sessions in a more informal structure and when we have time to listen.”

The Pew Research Center reported that the percentage of podcast listeners in America has  substantially increased in the past 10 years. About 45 percent of Americans ages 12 and older have listened to a podcast, according to Edison Research and Triton Digital survey data, and 26 percent listen to at least one podcast a month. Continue reading

Member News: Jon Marshall

Jon Marshall (Northwestern University) co-wrote an Op-Ed for The New York Times, “The Myth of Watergate Bipartisanship,” which was published on Aug. 14. Marshall collaborated on the column with Michael Conway, who served as counsel for the House Judiciary Committee during its impeachment inquiry of Richard Nixon. The Op-Ed argues that the actions and words of GOP congressmen in support of President Trump during the investigation of potential collusion with Russia resemble the behavior of Republicans during the Watergate era who steadfastly backed Nixon until the end of his presidency.

Member News: Carol Terracina Hartman

Carol Terracina-Hartman (Lock Haven University of Pennsylvania) will be honored with the College Media Association Adviser Award in the category of four-year newspaper adviser. She will receive the award at the 2018 Conference in Louisville, Kentucky, on Friday, October 26. Hartman was nominated by students working at The Royal Purple at the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater, The American River Current at American River College, and The Clarion Call at Clarion University of Pennsylvania, who collectively put forward her name.

Member News: Donna Halper

Donna Halper (Lesley University) published “Preserving the Story of Greater Boston’s Pioneering Broadcast Stations 1XE and WGI” in the latest issue of Antique Wireless Association Review. The study focused on one of the first U.S. radio stations, which featured early newscasts and women announcers.

Book Excerpt—On Press: The Liberal Values That Shaped The News


By Matthew Pressman (Harvard University Press, November 2018)
“We are living in a time of revolution,” Los Angeles Times publisher Otis Chandler told a conference of his company’s executives in May 1969. “You can go right down the list,” he said: race, student unrest, riots, crime, pollution, wars, poverty, corruption. “It is a very difficult time to be in this business of reporting news, because people do not tend to agree with what you are saying to them. They don’t want to hear the bad news.”[1]
But it was not simply the tumultuous events of the day that made reporting so difficult; changes in journalists’ practices and beliefs created a host of challenges that the press had not faced in previous generations. The first set of changes predated the “revolution” that Otis Chandler mentioned. During the early to mid-1960s, interpretive reporting became a central component of news coverage, transforming the reporter from stenographer to analyst. News articles would increasingly include the reporter’s judgments about controversial issues, in addition to quotes and background information.[2] The second set of changes resulted from the revolutionary climate of the late 1960s and early 1970s. Even those journalists who remained wary of the era’s radical movements recognized some truth in their critiques: the injustice of the Vietnam War, the systemic nature of racism and poverty, the self-interest and sometimes corruption of America’s corporate and political class. These realizations led to a more skeptical, adversarial approach to news coverage.
Moreover, many journalists were swept up in the movements to remake American society, and their passion helped pull the entire profession to the left. News professionals following the precepts of objectivity tend to seek out a centrist position.[3] But in a newsroom where the main ideological division was between Cold War liberals and adherents of the New Left, the center could appear significantly to the left of what the country at large would consider the middle of the road. Journalists understood, of course, that the newsroom was not a microcosm of the nation, but even if they tried to correct for their own and their colleagues’ political leanings, the views of the Silent Majority rarely merited the same respect as the views of the left. For one thing, leftist views seemed more newsworthy: calls for reshaping American society from colorful provocateurs made for better copy than calls for law and order or lower taxes from local chambers of commerce. (This would begin to change in the late 1970s, as the New Right adopted more effective media tactics.) Plus, newspapers worried greatly about failing to attract young readers, and because they believed the educated youth to be overwhelmingly left-wing, they wished to treat such ideas respectfully.
Vice President Spiro Agnew, in his speeches denouncing the news media in 1969 and 1970, suggested that journalists had adopted the antiestablishment attitude of the era. He had a point. They were more likely than in previous decades to challenge the White House, to write critically about powerful institutions, and to publicize the views of dissenters. But to label this attitudinal shift “liberal bias,” as Agnew did and as many others have done, oversimplifies the issue.

[1] Transcript of Los Angeles Times Executive Conference: Editorial Excellence, May 17, 1969, Los Angeles Times Records, box 85, folder 5, The Huntington Library, San Marino, CA.
[2] See Chapter 1 for details about the rise of interpretive reporting.
[3] As Herbert Gans has argued, “moderatism” is a core journalistic value: Herbert Gans, Deciding What’s News (1979; repr., New York: Vintage Books edition, 1980), 51-52. See also Chapter 3 of this book.

Matthew Pressman is an assistant professor of journalism at Seton Hall University and holds a Ph.D. in History from Boston University. Prior to his academic career, he was an assistant editor and online columnist at Vanity Fair. To purchase his book through Amazon, click here.