Invitation to Virtual Symposium on the 19th Century Press, the Civil War, and Free Expression, November 11-13, 2021

Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division Washington, D.C. LC-DIG-cwpb-01703

Clio readers are invited to the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga’s twenty-ninth annual Symposium on the 19th Century Press, the Civil War, and Free Expression Thursday, Friday, and Saturday, November 11–13, 2021. The purpose of the conference is to share current research and to develop a series of monographs on the 19th century press, the Civil War and the press, and 19th century concepts of free expression.

Papers from the first five conferences were published by Transaction Publishers in 2000 as a book of readings called The Civil War and the Press. Purdue University Press published papers from past conferences in three books: Memory and Myth: The Civil War in Fiction and Film from Uncle Tom’s Cabin to Cold Mountain (2007), Words at War: The Civil War and American Journalism (2008), and Seeking a Voice: Images of Race and Gender in the 19th Century Press (2009). In 2013, Transaction published Sensationalism: Murder, Mayhem, Mudslinging, Scandals, and Disasters in 19th-Century Reporting, and in 2014, it published A Press Divided: Newspaper Coverage of the Civil War. In 2017, Transaction (now Routledge/Taylor & Francis) published After the War: The Press in a Changing America, 1865–1900, and our latest book, The Antebellum Press: Setting the Stage for Civil War, was published by Routledge/Taylor & Francis in 2019.  

All paper sessions are free and open to the public via Zoom. To register, please email us at west-chair-office@utc.edu with your name, affiliation, email, cell phone number, and the identification name on your Zoom account. Please also indicate which days you would like to attend. Download the 2021 Symposium Program here. For more information, please contact Dr. David Sachsman.

Journalism History will allow open format initial submissions

Journalism History will adapt an open format policy for initial journal submissions starting Jan. 1, 2022.

The decision comes after months of discussion among the journal staff followed by a survey of journal reviewers that found 80% of respondents supported or were neutral toward the policy change.

Under the policy, scholars may submit an article submission in any standard academic reference style for initial review. If the article is accepted or receives a revise and resubmit, the author must change the citation style to the journal’s current Chicago formatting for publication.

Therefore, the citation style and appearance of the final journal product itself will remain the same.

The revised policy was proposed for multiple reasons. No. 1, we must increase the number of submissions the journal receives. To be a competitive journal, we must decrease the 50% acceptance rate of the past few years. We must grow our brand beyond our finite number of members to keep journalism history growing.

As one survey respondent wrote:

“Honestly, there aren’t many journals that use Chicago anymore, particularly in journalism fields. Many younger academics are being encouraged to publish outside of history journals, in particular, to show that their work has a broader impact. If I were still a Ph.D. student or a pre-tenure faculty member, I’d go with a journal that allowed me to submit in the citation style that fit with the broadest number of journals because I would write a first draft in that style. (APA, usually, I’ve found.)”

Another wrote:

“It seems to me that we will get more submissions if scholars are allowed to submit work using the citation format with which they are most comfortable. More than likely, many of the articles we receive are revisions of conference papers, which of course use a wide variety of citation formats. With adoption of open format submissions, the scholar can concentrate on substantive areas of revising his/her conference paper before submitting to the journal. Once accepted, a paper can be easily revised to fit our journal’s style requirements.”

Related to this, another reason that we have revised the policy is due to other major journalism journals already moving to open formats in recent years to be more flexible. Therefore, we now better align with trends in academic journals. We hope that more people will consider us if they do not have to change to our very specific style when they can more easily submit elsewhere.

As another survey respondent wrote:

“Many scholars write their papers in styles other than Chicago, but that does not make their historical research any less valid. Journalism History should be open to considering all quality historical research regardless of style. The journal may be missing out on excellent articles by restricting style to Chicago because some scholars may decline to submit if they have to do the work to convert to Chicago style before they even know if they’ve been accepted.”

Another wrote:

“I think we should put as few roadblocks as possible in the way of people submitting to the journal, and requiring them to submit a manuscript in a specific format seems to me to be an unnecessary roadblock.  If the article is accepted, it can be put into a consistent format.”

Furthermore, a brief diversity analysis of the journal conducted by Erika Pribanic-Smith and Teri Finneman found significant diversity gaps in the past 10 years in journal topics, including a lack of scholarship related to media and disability history, LGBTQ media history, and media history related to race and ethnicity.

Gerry Lanosga is leading a team with Candi Carter Olson, Lillie Fears and Lexie Little to do a more comprehensive analysis, but it’s already clear there are significant gaps that must be addressed.

Therefore, we hope providing an easier process for submissions will make us more attractive to researchers who may not have considered us before in order to broaden the scope of our content.

One survey respondent wrote:

“I suspect that this would be an enticement for researchers from outside of traditional history programs to consider submitting to the journal. Media students, for example, who have not had a crossover with a history program are far more likely to be working in MLA or APA.”

Another respondent wrote:

“I think this is a move toward inclusivity, which I support. I do want us to continue publishing in CMOS and hold up the integrity of that citation style. However, let’s reduce what is likely a barrier from our colleagues in other divisions and who publish in other arenas.”

To be sure, we received a number of comments in the surveys expressing concerns about the lack of notes in non-Chicago citation styles, the different writing styles and different readability. We understand these concerns and are willing to try this as a pilot program that we evaluate along the way.

One thing that we do know is doing nothing is not an option. If we want journalism history to not only survive but thrive, we simply have to do more to encourage a broader group of scholars to engage in our field.

– Teri Finneman, Publications Chair

Member News: Amber Roessner, Andrew Stoner, Owen Johnson

Amber Roessner, an associate professor in the University of Tennessee’s School of Journalism and Electronic Media, appeared in Season 2, Episode 4 of the PBS documentary series In Their Own Words, speaking about Jimmy Carter’s failed first gubernatorial campaign. The episode, “Jimmy Carter,” which aired on September 28, can be streamed here on PBS.

Andrew E. Stoner, an associate professor in Communication Studies at California State University, Sacramento, is the author of a new book Dear Abby, I’m Gay: Newspaper Advice Columnists & Homosexuality in America (McFarland Publishing, July 2021). The book examines the role newspaper advice columnists played in advancing understanding and acceptance of LGBTQ people in the twentieth century.

Owen V. Johnson, an associate professor emeritus of Journalism at Indiana University, has a new article, “The Pullman Herald 1888-1989:  A History and a Memoir” in Bunchgrass Historian  (Vol. 47, no. 2), a publication of the Whitman County Historical Society.

Award Call: Best Journalism and Mass Communication History Book

The Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication History Division is soliciting entries for its annual award for the best journalism and mass communication history book. The winning author will receive a plaque and a $500 prize at the August 2022 AEJMC conference in Detroit, Michigan. Attendance at the conference is encouraged as the author will be invited to be a guest for a live taping of the Journalism History podcast during the History Division awards event. The competition is open to any author of a media history book regardless of whether they belong to AEJMC or the History Division. Only first editions with a 2021 copyright date will be accepted. Entries must be received by February 1, 2022. Submit four hard copies of each book or an electronic copy (must be an e-Book or pdf manuscript in page-proof format) along with the author’s mailing address, telephone number, and email address to:

Gwyneth Mellinger, AEJMC History Book Award Chair
James Madison University
54 Bluestone Drive, MSC 2104
Harrisonburg, VA 22807

mellingx@jmu.edu

If you have any questions, please contact Book Award chair Gwyneth Mellinger at mellingx@jmu.edu.

Member Spotlight: Jennifer Moore

Associate professor of journalism, University of Minnesota-Duluth

Where you got your Ph.D.: Hubbard School of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities

Current favorite class: History of American Media

Current research project: I am very excited about my sabbatical leave during the 2021-2022 school year. I have a couple of projects planned, including a book-length manuscript about a largely forgotten but important newspaper editor.

Fun fact about yourself: During the pandemic, I’ve been volunteering with a local music venue in Duluth to help produce live-streaming performances on YouTube.

Journalism History Podcast Spotlight

Each month, Clio will highlight the latest episode of the Journalism History podcast and recommend a set of episodes from the archives. The podcasts — available on the website and through many podcast players — are excellent teaching tools, easy to add to your syllabi. Transcripts of each episode are available online.  

If you want to hear more from this month’s featured book author, check out Episode 59: The History of Food Journalism. Food journalism expert Kimberly Wilmot Voss discusses the significance of food history and the story behind New York Times food writer Jane Nickerson and her food section from 1942-1957.

This month’s recommendations from the archive focus on sports journalism, with episodes that span the 19th and 20th centuries:

Episode 71: Black Ballplayers as Foreign Correspondents Historian Brian Campbell describes the experiences of African American athletes who played baseball and achieved social status in Latin America and the Caribbean from the 1930s to 1950s, and he discusses how journalists used their stories of racial equality abroad to critique the color line in the United States.

Episode 61: A True Newspaper Woman Researcher Carolina Velloso explores the career of sports reporter, photojournalist and national magazine writer Sadie Kneller Miller, a trailblazing journalist at the turn of the 20th century whose story had been lost to history.

Episode 58: Jackie Robinson After Baseball Historian Ray McCaffrey describes the activism of baseball pioneer Jackie Robinson after he retired from the game that he integrated, including his newspaper columns in support of Muhammad Ali’s right to refuse military service and a boycott of the 1968 Summer Olympics.

And for something extra spooky for Halloween:

BONUS: Finding Ghosts in Newspapers For a special Halloween bonus episode, we trace American newspapers’ fascination with ghosts back to the 1800s with historian Paulette D. Kilmer.

Q and A with author Kimberly Voss about Newspaper Fashion Editors in the 1950s and 60s

Newspaper Fashion Editors in the 1950s and 60s: Women Writers of the Runway (Palgrave, 2021)

Describe the focus of your book. 

This book documents the careers of newspaper fashion editors and details what the fashion sections included in the post-World War II years. The analysis covers social, political, and economic aspects of fashion. It also addresses journalism ethics, fashion show reporting, and the decline in fashion journalism editor positions. The content of the newspaper fashion sections and the women who oversaw the sections have not been examined enough by historians.

This book explores the complexity of the sections and the reporting the women did. Fashion editors worked in the women’s pages of newspapers. When the women’s pages turned into lifestyle sections, many fashion editor positions were largely eliminated at metropolitan newspapers. But prior to the loss of the women’s pages, the post-World War II years through the early 1970s were considered the Golden Era.

Fashion editors pulled wire copy, interviewed local women about their fashion choices, and visited local stores to see what was available. They also traveled to national and international fashion shows, interviewed designers, and offered their opinions on trends. Many of them also served as beauty editors – writing about new products, weight loss options, and the popular hairstyles. The editors interacted with each other and were able to network at a time when they were usually excluded from journalism organizations. Most fashion editors stayed in their position at their newspapers for many years and became experts on what their readers were interested in.

How did you come across this subject? Why did it interest you?

Despite the importance of clothing as an industry and in a person’s individual life, scholarship on newspaper fashion reporting is lacking. Even the more recent research on women in journalism has ignored the traditional women’s section reporting, focusing more on women whose work reached the front pages of newspapers. Yet, areas like fashion journalism were where women were making their mark for decades. When it came to fashion journalism beginning in those post-World War II years, fashion editors held dominant positions. They chronicled the fashions worn in professional and personal worlds and in doing so served as social critics. They also promoted the work of American designers at a changing time in the business as designers became household names.

What archives or research materials did you use? 

Much of the material for the book came from archives and oral histories. One of the most helpful archives was the National Women and Media Collection (NWMC) in Missouri, especially the Penney-Missouri Award papers. The editors who won the annual fashion award wrote letters back and forth to the director of the awards. These letters revealed how the women covered fashion in their communities and at their newspapers. These papers also included speeches given by several of the fashion editors, which revealed their views on fashion and journalism. Marjorie Paxson, who helped establish the NWMC archive, also donated papers that led to many fashion clips from the Houston Chronicle in the 1950s. Washington Star fashion editor Eleni Epstein also gave her papers to the NWMC. They revealed not only her fashion reporting but correspondence with her editors and her readers. Several other archives provided additional information such as fashion editor Aileen Ryan’s materials at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.

My research also led me to the oral histories of Nina Hyde, located at the Fashion Institute of Technology, and Marylin Bender, located at Columbia University. Both histories also focused on their law degrees – although neither women practiced law. Two other oral histories examined were of Nadeane Walker Anderson, at the Associated Press archive, and Virginia Pope, at the New York Public Library.

How does your book relate to journalism history? How is it relevant to the present?

Women’s liberation leaders wanted newspapers to eliminate the women’s pages and put news about women on the front pages. It was an interesting theory but it did not work in practice. Instead, much of the news about women was eliminated. Some women’s page editors wanted to save their sections and raise the standards of the sections. Ultimately, these sections became lifestyle or feature sections. It also meant the loss of many fashion editors’ jobs. This project, like my previous books, documents the significant material in the women’s pages. It leads to a better understanding of soft news and the work of women’s page journalists.

What advice do you have for other historians that are working on or starting book projects?

Find your writing process and honor it. I try to write early in the morning before teaching and service commitments come up. I also make a plan for what I will cover next after each writing session. It helps provide a structure for the next writing moment. Writing groups can be helpful for accountability. Overall, simply finding time to write is the most important thing.

A Word From the Chair: Our Goals for the Year Ahead

Cayce Myers, associate professor of public relations and director of graduate studies at Virginia Tech’s School of Communication, is the new chair of the History Division.

Thank you to all of the History Division members who helped create a great 2021 virtual conference.  Despite the ongoing pandemic, our division maintained its high quality scholarship, while also continuing our division’s continued support for scholars, especially graduate students and newer faculty.  As we begin to work toward our 2022 conference in Detroit (hopefully in-person!), there are a few things that I want to mention as the Chair of the History Division.

First, thank you to last year’s leadership team, especially Dr. Will Mari (Louisiana State) who did a fantastic job as Chair for our 2021 conference.  Additionally, I want to thank Dr. Maddie Liseblad (California State University, Long Beach) our Second Vice Chair and Research Chair, who managed our paper submission process resulting in a series of high quality papers by both faculty and graduate students.  We also welcome Dr. Rachel Grant (Florida), our new addition to the leadership team, who is the Second Vice Chair and Research Chair for the Division.

Our 2020-2021 year in the History Division had many accomplishments including the expansion of outreach and mentorship under the direction of former Chairs Dr. Erika Pribanic-Smith (Texas-Arlington) and Dr. Teri Finneman (Kansas).  Dr. Pam Parry (Southeast Missouri State) assumed her role as the editor of our division’s journal, Journalism History, ahead of schedule in June 2021.  With the help of Dr. Keith Greenwood (Missouri) the division also launched its new website https://mediahistorydivision.com, which contains a wealth of content about scholarship, teaching, and division news that can be utilized by our members in their research and classes.  The website also contains the links to the division’s highly successful Journalism History Podcast, which contains a cross section of interviews about a variety of historical subjects produced by Dr.Teri Finneman.  

As we approach the 2021-2022 academic year, we face an evolving situation with the global pandemic that affects our lives, work, and society.  What that means for the History Division is that our goals for the next year are aspirational and tempered with the knowledge that things may evolve with the pandemic over the next year.  With that said, the 2021-2022 goals for the History Division are:

  1.  Support our members in their teaching, scholarship, and service as we transition back toward in-person meetings in 2022.
  2. Continue our division’s mission of recruiting new scholars into the division, and support young and seasoned scholars through our division’s mentorship program.
  3. Continue our support for and presence at our regional AEJMC conferences, which supports younger scholars, especially graduate students.
  4. Continue our outreach and engagement with the broader historical research community, and look for ways to create partnerships between those organizations and our division.
  5. Explore the possibility of holding a pre-conference ahead of next year’s AEJMC conference in Detroit.

All of these goals are only possible with the help of our dedicated History Division members, and I appreciate the willingness over this past year of members’ work on mentorship, research outreach, teaching initiatives, and awards.  It is this work that makes our division a great place for scholars at any stage to share their work.

As we begin this new academic year there are a few things to note.  Our research panels for the 2022 annual conference are due by September 15th.  Please review the call for papers, and submit proposals to our Vice Chair Dr. Maddie Liseblad at madeleine.liseblad@csulb.edu.

I also welcome any suggestions, questions or comments.  Feel free to contact me at mcmyers@vt.edu.  Once again, thank you all for your work for the division, and best wishes for the upcoming year.

– Cayce Myers

Journalism History Podcast Spotlight

Each month, Clio will highlight the latest episode of the Journalism History podcast and recommend a set of episodes from the archives. The podcasts — available on the website and through many podcast players — are excellent teaching tools, easy to add to your syllabi. Transcripts of each episode are available online.   

Latest episode: Episode 86, Woodrow Wilson’s Ministry of Propaganda – John Maxwell Hamilton on the Committee on Public Information.

This month’s recommendations from the archive:

Episode 50.5: Why Does Journalism History Matter? To celebrate the first 50 episodes, the podcast hosts reflect with prior guests on the central question of the show: Why does journalism history matter?

Bonus Episode: The History of American Epidemics Katie Foss discusses her upcoming book, Constructing the Outbreak, which analyzes seven epidemics spanning more than 200 years. She covers how shifts in journalism and medicine influenced the coverage, preservation, and fictionalization of different disease outbreaks

Episode 83: America’s ‘Tory’ Printer Autumn Linford discusses the real story of James Rivington, the most infamous printer of the American Revolution. Her research seeks to broad the historical understanding of Rivington beyond the textbook mentions of his work as a Tory newspaper printer.